Disposed
Shri Vishnu Power and Energy Private Limited v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/330/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
CASE No.
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA330/22 16t10t24 |
Appticantsby ShriAtutChoudhary, Advocate RespondentbyMs.SurbhiJain,ProxyAdvocate for ShriSunitJain,Advocate |
|
| CounselfortheApplicantBankhasfitedan appticationforwithdrawalofthecaseon04/10124 alongwithAffidavitofShri ManojKumarDaga Appticant No.-5.ltis statedthattheAppticantshave fited thepresentSAassaitingtheactioninitiatedby theRespondent-BankundertheSecuritisationAct.lt isfurtherstatedthatduringthependencyoftheSA theApplicants haveenteredintocompromiseand accordinglydepositedthetotaloutstandingofRs' 33.82CroresandtheAppticantsdonotwishto prosecuteanyfurther.TheCounselfortheAppticant- bankfurtherpraysfor withdrawal of thepresentSA. CounselforRespondentBankhasgotnoobjection. ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheAppticantandthe submissionmadebytheCounselforAppticantsthat the Applicanthavedeposited an amountofRs.33.82 Crorestowardsfutlandfinalsettlementof thedues, thepresent SAstands disposedofaswithdrawn. Record beconsignedto therecordroom. (Ram IWaS et) Presidingofficer |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicants
Respondent-Bank
Not Specified
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court