Petitioner applicant appeared via video conference; default notice issued for non-appearance; application dismissed in default of prosecution; matter closed.
Application dismissed in default of prosecution; file consigned to records.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts RecoveryTribunal-Il,Delhi
sA/329 12022
SH NARESHGUPTAVS THE KANGRA COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
25.09.2024
Item no. 34
Present:None for aPPlicant.
Ms. sweta sunder,proxy counsel for respondentFI.
Matter is takenthroughVideo Conferencingl hybrid Mode'
The Ld. Counselfor respondentFI has appearedtoday before this Tribunal.
The Ld. counselfor the respondentFI has submitted that the matter has beensettled between the parties and the account of the applicanthas already been closed.
Despite issuance ofdefautt notice, no one appearedon behalfof the applicant. Itappears that the applicantsare not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, thepresent sA is dismissedin default for non-prosecution.
File be consignedto records.
q-'
(SUSHIL KUMA(RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SH NARESH GUPTA
THE KANGRA COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
