This order in a securitisation application dismissed the suit after the applicant deposited the full amount and the account was closed by the respondent bank.
Securitisation Application No.324/2022 stands dismissed. All pending interlocutory applications stands disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 22. Sr. |
03.20 No.7 |
24 1 SA No.324/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.324/2022 Sunder Heritage ..Applicant Versus State Bank of India ..Respondent Saniya Shaikh h/for Mr. Nikhil P. Runwal for the applicant. Mr. Arun Rakh– Advocate for the Respondent bank. The matter is taken through Hybrid. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that they have deposited entire amount with the respondent-bank and the entire amount has been received by the respondent and the account is closed.She requests for disposal of the matter. 2. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant, I pass the following order. ORDER A. As the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid the Securitisation Application No.324/2022 stands dismissed. B. Accordingly al the pending interlocutory applications stands disposed off. C. Consign the file to the Record Room. The parties may download the order from the official web-site. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.324/2022) Page 1 of 1
Sunder Heritage
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
