The Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chandigarh dismissed the applicant's application in default due to complete absence of the applicant and defendant in court after repeated notices, determining the applicant was not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/310/2024 SARBJIT SINGH Vs
SHUBHAM HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE COMPANY 20.08.2024
Item No.23
Present: None for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
SARBJIT SINGH
SHUBHAM HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE COMPANY
(A S Narang)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
