Mathu Ram v. Punjab National Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/30/2024 MATHU RAM Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
04.04.2024 Item No.74
Present: Sh.Lovish, proxy for Sh.Rajnish Chauhan, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.Komal Singh, Nodal Officer for respondent bank.
Mr. Lovish, has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to pursue this application. Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Manoj Ram
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court