In this debt recovery tribunal proceeding, an interim application filed by the applicant borrower was dismissed because the applicant submitted a memo stating the loan account was settled with the respondent bank, leaving the case to be advanced to the next scheduled date.
IA allowed; main suit advanced to next date; remaining IA dismissed as settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (DRT) – I, HYDERABAD
Daily Order
Case No. : SA/280/2024
Date : 28/08/2024
IA 2198/2024: Heard. Petition is allowed. The case is advanced to today from 0309-2024. Applicant Counsel filed a memo stating that the borrowers settled the loan account with the respondent bank. Hence SA is dismissed as settled out of Court.
Sd/-
G. Gopichand (Hon’ble Presiding Officer)
Applicant
Bank
G. Gopichand
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
