Surinder Paul Khattar v. Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Application dismissed in default due to the applicant's failure to appear before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/278/2024 SURINDER PAUL KHATTAR Vs PIRAMAL CAPITAL AND HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
18.11.2024
Item No.35
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.Gurnam Singh proxy for Sh.Nitin Grover, Counsel for respondent FI.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Surinder Paul Khattar
Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court