In default proceedings for non-prosecution, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Delhi, dismissed the arbitration reference initiated by the debtor company, as no representative appeared despite the default notice.
SA dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl277l2022
MS SHRI BANKE BIHARI COTFAB PRIVATE LIMITED Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
20.05.2024
Item no. 34
Present: None for applicant.
Ms. Sweety Sood, counsel for respondent bank.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent bank has appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite issuance of default notice, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
-t
-/
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BANKE BIHARI COTFAB PRIVATE LIMITED
STATE BANK OF INDIA
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
