Represented applicant stated he had no further instructions. The Special Application was dismissed for non-prosecution with file consignment to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/271/2022 SH NARESH SHARMA Vs INDIAN BANK (ALLAHABAD BANK)
13.08.2024 Item No.3
Present: Sh. Yogesh Kumar, Counsel for the Applicant. Ms.Jasleen Kaur, Counsel for respondent bank (on vc).
Mr.Yogesh Kumar states that he has no further instructions from the applicant. Accordingly, the present SA is dismissed for non-prosecution. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sh NARESH SHARMA
INDIAN BANK (ALLAHABAD BANK)
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
