Respondent counsels appeared before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chandigarh. The applicant (Shri Dhiraj Kumar) did not appear, leading the Presiding Officer to dismiss the application in default due to lack of prosecution.
Application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default for non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/267/2024 SHRI DHIRAJ KUMAR Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
16.12.2024 Item No.4
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.Kamal, Counsel for respondent No.1/bank. Sh.Manu Loon, Counsel for respondent No.2&3.
This is third pass over. Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Shri Dhiraj Kumar
Punjab National Bank
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
