it i:,.r. -rr-r[1111 on 3 r.og.2o21, the Respondent issued demand notice r-r,/:' Ir)(.'rr o1'rrrc Act and the said notice was received by the Applicant as ' r 'iit :i. r'(r b-v thc postar track report riled by the Respondent and th. s'ri'r rL,Licr-' was arso published in Engrish and Telugu daily n(,',\ sl)i1t_(.r-s. Ttrereafter on lO.OS.2022, the Respondent issued pr):;:'it'S.)i,). ,olice u/s 13(a) of the Act for taking symboric possession ol'riit.'s''ircdrile property and the said notice was received by the A1;,,Jii r,rii .s cvidcnccd by thc postar acknowledgements. The said ni.rti.t' \r,.ri pr,rblished in two da,y newspapers as evidenced by the cr';f ii s (,r r)erpcr publication filed by the Respondent and the said f)('r{rr'(' rrriS ,.rso affixed on the schedule property as depicted in the pli,'it.'':r'.,1.,i15 r'ired by the Respondent. Thereafter, the Respondent it::ir'rlt 'i sLt:1ls u/s 14 of the Act, 2OO2 before CMM, Medchal_ Mir,.irjrri.i frrr taking physicar possession of the schedule property by a1-'1,,t.;irrLrircnt of advocate commissioner and the advocate c(;r,rriis:.itir.r' issued notice for taking physical possession of the sr'irt rirri propcrty. So, as per the documents filed by the R(:iriorrtir'r)1, it is evident that the Respondent has scrupurousry foiilj\'('(i LIr. prr>cedure in issuing demand notice, possession notice 3rr,r .rr-;.. it.,r' raking stcps for appointment of advocate commissioner fc r' r r ' ii i; "1 g.,lr'sicill possession of the schedure property.
