This order dismisses an application filed before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chandigarh in default due to the absence of the applicant. As the applicant failed to appear at the hearing despite the case being called several times, the Presiding Officer concluded that the applicant was not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/251/2024 KAMAL KUMAR Vs UCO BANK
22.08.2024 Item No.26
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.Nonish Kumar, Counsel for the respondent bank.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Kamal Kumar
UCO Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
