The application filed by the applicant was dismissed in default for non-appearance despite repeated notice. The court held the applicant appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/245/2024 RITU BALA Vs INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
14.08.2024 Item No.8
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.Rajan Puri, Counsel for respondent bank.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Ritu Bala
Indian Overseas Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
