This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 22.07.2024 | Exh. |
Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.240 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Advocate Mr. Rajesh Nagori for the Applicant. Advocate Mr. Padmakar Garad (through video-conferencing) for the Respondent. Vakalatnama (exhibit-7) filed by counsel for Respondent. Counsel for the Respondent submits that the Applicant’s creditor is neither the borrower nor the guarantor so, he cannot interfere in the SARFAESI proceeding initiated by the Respondent Bank against the borrower but at the same time, counsel for the Respondent admits that he has received the copy of Application annexed with this Application filed under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 before NCLT, Mumbai. The Applicant has approached the NCLT as |
||
| creditor, so, there shall be interim moratorium till disposal of that |
|||
| Application. However, the Applicant has no locus standi to seek any stay against Respondent Bank, as he is not |
Page 1 of 2
under debt, so, this Securitisation
Application No.240 of 2024 is not
maintainable and stands dismissed.
File be consigned to the Record
Room.
Sd/-
Closed
Typed by- I/c P.O.
Radhika ,
Stenographer DRT-II
Page 2 of 2
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court