M/S S.S. Bottle Store v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Higher court dismissed the application of the appellant in default due to non-appearance despite multiple summonses, with the hearing concluded in the afternoon.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/238/2023 M/S S.S. BOTTLE STORE Vs CANARA BANK
26.11.2024 Item No.14
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh. Yogesh Kumar, Counsel for respondent bank. Sh. Mohd. Arham, Counsel for auction purchaser (on VC).
This is third pass over. Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
M/S S.S. BOTTLE STORE
CANARA BANK
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court