In this debt recovery application, counsel informed the tribunal that the underlying account had been settled. Consequently, the tribunal disposed of the matter without substantive adjudication.
The application is disposed of as the account has been settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/236/2023 M/S SHAMA CREATIONS Vs KARUR VYSYA BANK
14.08.2024
Item No.4
Present: Ms.Ayushi Jaryal, proxy for Sh.A S Likhari, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.SC Prajapati proxy for Sh.Nitin Grover, Counsel for respondent bank.
Counsel for the parties state that the account has since been settled. Accordingly, the application is disposed of . File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
M/s Shama Creations
Karur Vysya Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
