The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the Special Appeal in default for non-appearance by the applicant, observing that the applicant was not interested in pursuing the case.
Special Appeal dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl22812023 ISHWAR CHAND JANA VS IIFL HOMEFINANCE LIMITED
20.09.2024
Item no. 23
Present None for applicant. Shri Nikhi! Rawat, counsel forrespondent bank.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing/Hybrid Mode.
On perusal of the file it is obseruedthat none appeared on behalf of applicants on14.05.2024.Today also none appeared on behalf of the applicants.It appears the applicants are not interestedin 'pursuingthe case. Hence, thepresent SA is dismissedin defaultfor non- prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
9). (SUSHIL KUI'nn PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
ISHWAR CHAND JANA
IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED
SUSHIL KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
