Pankaj Kumar v. State Bank of India
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/227/2022 PANKAJ KUMAR Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
11.03.2024 Item No.53
Present: Sh. Sukhvinder Singh, proxy for Sh.Anuj Thakur, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.Vivek Verma, counsel for respondent bank.
Mr.Verma has filed reply to SA. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh, has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to pursue this application. Accordingly, the application is hereby
dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pankaj Kumar
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court