Disposed

Afruza Begam v. Ugro Capital Limited

DRT8 Aug 2024SA/213/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Special Audiencia petition filed by Afruza Begum against Urgo Capital Ltd. was disposed of as infructuous. The finance company withdrew the Demand Notice dated 03/02/2024, leaving no cause of action to support the proceeding. Consequently, the application had no subsisting cause of action.

What did the court decide?

The Special Audiencia petition (SA/213/20) was disposed of as infructuous following the withdrawal of the Demand Notice by the respondent finance company.

Afruza Begam versus Ugro Capital Limited — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2024)

¶1

	Order Sheet( continuation)
Case No. SA/213/20	24 Afruza Begum–Vs- Urgo Capital Ltd. & Anr.
Date of Order	Order with signature	O ffice action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary
08/08/2024 Sl. No. 34	Ld. Counsel, Mr. Nimesh Mishra and Mr. Ankit Chatterjee, appears for the Sarfaesi applicant. Ld. Counsel, Ms. Kuheli Deb, appears for the respondent No.3. Ld. Counsel for the respondent FC submits that respondent Finance Company has withdrawn Demand Notice dated 03/02/2024, hence SA becomes infructuous. As there is no cause of action subsisting against the applicant, SA is disposed of as the Demand Notice has been withdrawn.
	(AMBUJA MOHAN DAS) PRESIDING OFFICER

Afruza Begam v. Ugro Capital Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Afruza Begam v. Ugro Capital Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Canara Bank versus Pushpa Devi Bengani

State Bank of India versus M/S Shree Saishraddha Cements Pvt. Ltd.

Yes Bank versus Samsuzzoha

Suvodeep Das and Ors. versus Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.

Indian Bank versus Baruuni Sprits Pvt. Ltd.

Gautam Ghosh versus Uco Bank