Disposed

Sanjiv Kumar Sood and Anr. v. Yes Bank

DRT20 Jun 2024SA/209/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of the Special Appeal (SA/209/2023) for want of cause of action. The respondent bank withdrew the earlier demand and possession notices challenged in the appeal and issued fresh ones. An application to allow the filing of the fresh notices was also granted.

What did the court decide?

IA/1821/2023 allowed; SA/209/2023 disposed of for want of cause of action; applicant may file separate SA against subsequent notices.

Sanjiv Kumar Sood and Anr. versus Yes Bank — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2024)

¶1

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA

¶2

		Order Sheet (continuation)
Case No. SA/209/202	3	SANJIV KUMAR SOOD AND ANR Vs. YES BAN	K
			Office action
Date of the Order		Order with Signature	with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary
20.06.202 4	Ld. appeared.	Advocate for the Sarfaesi Applicant
	Ld. the Respo	Advocate Ms. Chaitali Acharjee appeared for ndents.
	Per	used the order of this Tribunal dated
	14/05/202	4. Respondent Bank has withdrawn the
	demand	notice, possession notice which has
	challenged	in SA 209 of 2023 and issued fresh
	demand applicant/	notice, possession notice to the borrower.
	Lea	rned counsel for the respondent bank has
	filed IA/1 prays for Possessio	821 of 2023. In this IA Respondent Bank appropriate order as the Demand Notice and n Notice challenged in SA 209 of 2023 are
	withdrawn	. Demand Notice dated 24/11/2022 and

¶3

Rina S.

¶4

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA

¶5

Date of the Order	Order with Signature	Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary
	Possession Notice dated 26/05/2023 have been challenged in SA 209 of 2023. As Respondent Bank has withdrawn the earlier Demand Notice dated 24/11/2022 and Possession Notice dated 26/05/2023 and issued subsequent Demand Notice dated 21/08/2023, this SA is liable to be disposed of. Hence, it is ordered: i) IA/1821 of 2023 is allowed.
	ii) SA 209 of 2023 is disposed of for want of cause of action.
	iii) Sarfaesi Applicant may challenge
	subsequent Demand Notice and Possession Notice by filing separate SA.
	(Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer

¶6

Rina S.

Sanjiv Kumar Sood and Anr. v. Yes Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjiv Kumar Sood and Anr. v. Yes Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms Ramchand and Sons versus Punjab National Bank

Bhola Nath Chal versus Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd.

Punjab National Bank versus Mr Avijit Dey

Shyamal Roy and Anr. versus Canara Bank

Hdfc Bank versus Jai Durga Transport Corporation

Ms Satya Narayan Ice Co. and Ors. versus Uco Bank