Disposed
Indira Harshad Kinariwala v. Shri Kaushal Umashankar Modi and Ors.
DRTSA/208/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 26.06.2024 | Exh. |
Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.208 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate Mr. Vinod Sampat for the Applicant. Advocate Mr. Charles De Souza for the Respondent. |
|||
| 8 | Service affidavit (exhibit-8) filed by the Applicant. Counsel for the Applicant submits that she has been cheated and she was not aware that before putting her as a tenant in the premises, the borrower had already mortgaged the property with the Respondent so, let the Respondent take the possession but, she may be permitted to remove her goods within fifteen days and the request of the Applicant is acceptable to the Respondent Bank. Let the Respondent take possession of the secured asset today itself. In case, the Applicant makes an application with the Respondent for removal of goods, the Respondent shall provide necessary assistance to the Applicant to remove the goods within two days. |
Accordingly, I.A. No.1270 of 2024 and
S.A. No.208 of 2024 stands disposed of
being infructuous.
File be consigned to the Record
Room.
Closed
Sd/-
Typed by- I/c P.O.
Radhika ,
Stenographer DRT-II
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court