The Tribunal allowed the applicant's withdrawal of the Securitisation Application by consent of the parties and dismissed the application as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Securitisation Application No.8 of 2024 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.9
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1014 of 2024
In
SECURITISATION APPLICATION NO.8 of 2024
Maya Arun Surekha … Applicant
Versus ACRE Ltd. … Defendant
Ms Saumya Tripathi i/b Mr Jairam Chandani – Advocate for the applicant.
Mr Anmol Menon i/b M/s. Dhaval Vussonji & Asso. – Advocates for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 30th May 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
30.05.2024
Sr. No.9
| SA No.8 of 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Maya Arun Sureka Vs. ACRE Ltd. |
| Ms Saumya Tripathi i/b Mr Jairam Chandani – Advocate for the applicant. |
||
| Mr Anmol Menon i/b M/s. Dhaval Vussonji & Asso. – Advocates for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in I.A. No.1014 of 2024 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1014 of 2024, |
||
| Securitisation Application No.8 of 2024 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. |
||
| 3. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Maya Arun Sureka
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
