Munish Behal v. Iifl Home Finance Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Application received without instructions from the applicant. The Presiding Officer dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/188/2024 MUNISH BEHAL Vs IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED
06.09.2024 Item No.12
Present: Sh. Sachin Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant.
Sh. Vineet Sehgal, Counsel for respondent FI.
Mr. Sachin Sharma, states that he pleads no instructions from the applicant. Accordingly, application filed by the applicant
is dismissed .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Munish Behal
IIFL HOME FINANCE LIMITED
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court