The appellant failed to appear via video conferencing, indicating lack of interest. The section was dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
The Special Appeal was dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/ 178 I 2023 SATPAL SINGH KOHLI AND ANR Vs CANARA BANK
14.08.2024
Item no. 24
Present: None.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
The Ld. Counsels for both the parties are not appeared today before this Tribunal.
Despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
--,-'-eIl (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
SATPAL SINGH KOHLI AND ANR
CANARA BANK
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
