Disposed
Uma Shankar Jhawar v. Yes Bank
DRTSA/171/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
On settlement of dues, the Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed withdrawal of the recovery proceedings and directed the respondent bank to return title deeds to the applicant.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of applications allowed; disposal as settled; direction to return title deeds.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
¶2
| Page No.- | Order Sheet( continuation) | |
|---|---|---|
| Case NO. NDN/171/20 |
24(SA) SADHANA SINHARAY Vs PASCHIM BANGA BANK |
GRAMIN |
| Date of the order |
Order with signature | Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary |
| 18/12/2024 | Ld. Advocate Ms. Oindrila Ghosh appears for the Applicant and presses the withdrawal petition, bearing application no. IA/2825/2024. Ld. Advocates, Mr. Baidurya Ghosal and Ms. Anupama Biswas appear for the Respondent Bank. In the above said application it was stated that the Applicant has filed an application being aggrieved by the action of the bank. During pendency of the Recovery Proceedings there has been a settlement between the parties and the Bank has received full and final settlement of the dues of Rs. 8,30,000/-. Hence, they do not want to proceed with the case. This application is affirmed by the Applicant and her signature is identified by Advocate on record. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant also prays for direction upon the Bank for return of title deed. In view of this, no prejudice will be caused to the SA Respondent if their response is dispensed with in this IA. This instant SA and any other pending IAs are disposed of in the category of dismissed as withdrawn as settled. Respondent Bank is directed to return the title deeds to the Applicant, if it is not required for other purpose. IA/2824/2024 is moved which is a put up application. Since the record is put up, the IA/2824/2024 is disposed of. (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer |
¶3
RS
¶4
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
¶5
RS
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether parties should be dispensed from appearing in response to the withdrawal application after the debt was settled.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Sadhana Sinharay
- respondent
Paschim Banga Bank Gramin
Coram
AI extract
Ambuja Mohan Das
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court