Sh Puran Chand v. Uco Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/167/2022 SH PURAN CHAND Vs UCO BANK
16.01.2024 Item No.52
Present: Sh. Rampal Kohli, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.JP Ranote, Counsel for respondent bank (on VC).
Mr. Ranote, counsel for the respondent bank has made a statement at the Bar that bank has withdrawn the sale notice. Mr.Kohli states that in view of the statement made by counsel for the respondent bank, he does not want to pursue this application. Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed as
withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sh Puran Chand
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court