Thc '\l-Plicaintsavailed loan from the Respondent Bank for business pur-li()s. against the mortgage of schedule property and regularly paid thc irrr. i,stalments. But the Respondent bank issued demand norir:,' trt.o2.o2,2o22 uls l3(2) of the SARFAESI Act,20o2 and the saic'l nori<:e was received by the Applicants. In response to the said norit:t" rhc Applicants sent their objections on 30.o3.2022 u/s 13(sA) of tlrt' sn t<FAl'lsr Act,2oo2 and the Respondent received the same on 07.t,t't -t.tt)) but the ltespondcnt Bank sent a belated repry on 05'o:'2o 22 by reiterating their earlier stand as alleged in the demand notir:t '['hus the Respondent Bank has violated the provisions of secrit.rrr3(rlA) of the SARFAESI Act,2oo2 as the said repty was issLrtil i-rflcr expiry of rs days from the date of receipt of replr',,bjccLions from the borrower. on 30.06.2022, some persons app-r.t.rirt;rrcd the Applicants and served a copy of possession notice dt.09.ub.'2o'22 issued u/s 13(4) of the Act and the said possession notr.i' {'zrs not affixecl on the schedule property and also not pul-ilisirt'<r in two daily newspapers. Thereafter, the Respondent bank issurtri Norice dt.10.06.2o22u1s 13(B) of the SARFAESI Act, 2oo2 . Thurs ll'rt'dcmand notice, possession notice and notice u/s 13(g) of SAttl"Ar'lr Act, 2oo2 are not legal and riabre to be set aside. Hence, the Srr.
