Dismissed
Deepak Kundu v. Icici Bank Limited
DRTSA/156/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Leave application allowed on account of withdrawal of main applicant's appeal following amicable settlement with respondent bank.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
¶2
| CaseNo.SA DateofOrder |
/1s62-- DeepakKundu ICICIBankLtd. Orderwithsignature |
l rfficeactionwithr dateand dated |
|---|---|---|
| OrderNo.04 Dt.13.03.2024 S l.No.24 |
Present: ForApplicant : Ld. Counsel1.4r.KrishnaDeo Das and _ pampa Dey Dhabal ForRespondent: Ld. Counsel K.Deb |
|
| ss | Ld Counselfor theAppticantfitedLA ror withdrawar orthemain, ^.,r""rii."li"'"ll::;;"'.::il; AffidavjtoftheapplicantMr.DeepakKundu. Duringthe pendencyoftheS.A.thematterhas been setuedwiththe RespondentBankandtheRespondentBankisnotgoingto continuewith theinstantproceedingandhasissueda,NoDues Certificate'.Sincethisis anamicablesetflementbetweenthe parties and the Applicantintendstowithdrawthemain S,A.,no preludicewibecausediftheLA.isallowedwithoutinviting responsefrom otherside_Accordlngly,theinstantLA.is aliowed andstands disposedofinthe categoryofdismissedas withdrawn as setded amicably.I.A.No. 729of2024 beingthe putuppetitionis also disposed of. |
|
| S.A. No. 156of2022atong with aredtsposedofaSwithdrawn otherpendingLA.s,ifany, File beconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobserving formallties. (KamalDe) PresidtngOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Deepak Kundu
- respondent
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Coram
AI extract
Kamal De
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court