The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the Special Appeal (SA 140/2024) for default on 28.08.2024, as no applicant or counsel appeared to prosecute the matter.
Special Appeal dismissed in default for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/140 12024 SWEETY NAMDEO Vs IIFL HOME FIN LTD
28.08.2024 Item no. 16
Present None for applicant. Shri Bhavesh Yadav, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl Hybrid Mode.
None appeared on behalf of the applicant. None appeared today. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for nonprosecution.
File be consigned to records.
+--,..-..,.1n, !
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, Delhi
P
SWEETY NAMDEO
IIFL HOME FIN LTD
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
