Applicant secured regularization of the account and moved for disposal. The Tribunal accepted the submission and disposed of the Securitisation Application without merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 18.04. Sr. No |
2024 .40 S.A.No.129/2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.129/2022 Mushtaque Ahmed Abdul Rauf .. Applicant Versus State Bank Of India & others .. Respondent |
||
| Mr. Gaikwad P S - Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Jethliya Dhiraj R – Advocate for respondent bank 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant approached the bank and had deposited the substantial amount and regularized the account. He requests for disposal of the matter. 2. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant, I pass the following order : ORDER A. As the account is regularized, the Securitisation Application No.129/2022 is disposed of. B. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK]
Mushtaque Ahmed Abdul Rauf
State Bank Of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
