The applicant deposited the entire amount under the Ombudsman Scheme. The bank issued a No Objection Certificate in pursuance. The symproceeding statutory appeal was disposed of on these facts.
The appeal was disposed of. A further instruction was that the file be consigned to the record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/119/2023 MITHILESH RATTAN Vs CANARA BANK
13.05.2024 Item No.22
Present: Ms.Kirat Kaur, proxy for Ms.Jyoti Sareen, Counsel for the Applicant (on vc).
Sh.RS Bhatia, Counsel for respondent bank.
Counsel for the parties state that in pursuance to the OTS, applicant has made whole of the payment and bank has also issued NOC. In view of this, the present SA stands disposed of . File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
MITHILESH RATTAN
CANARA BANK
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
