The applicant appeared without instructions; the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application as such.
Application dismissed due to lack of instructions from the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/119/2022 M/S TEG RESORTS PVT LTD Vs BANK OF BARODA (VIJAYA BANK)
19.04.2024
Item No.69
Present: Sh. DS Sidhu, proxy Counsel for Sh. Vikas Bali, Counsel for the Applicant.
Sh. CS Pasricha, Counsel for respondent bank.
Sh. RK Jindal, Counsel for respondent No.3 and 4.
Counsel for the applicant states that he pleads no instructions from the applicant. Accordingly, the application filed by the applicant is hereby dismissed .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
M/s Teg Resorts Pvt Ltd
Bank of Baroda (Vijaya Bank)
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
