DA 116 of 2023 before DRT-II, Delhi. The applicant failed to appear on the hearing dates. The possessing officer dismissed the application in default for non-prosecution.
Application dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi sA/116 12023 NAND KISHOR Vs IIFL HOME FINANCE LTD
23.04.2024
Item no. 36
Present: None for applicant.
Mr. Sadab Samani, counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing.
None appeared on the last date of hearing on beharf of the applicant. None appears today. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present sA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
L,z (susHrl KUpTAR RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
Nand Kishor
IIFL HOME FINANCE LTD
Sushil Kuttar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
