Mrinal Ahuja v. Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd(Piramal Finance)
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Appeal was dismissed for default as the applicant failed to appear on record despite various calls. No pronouncement of law was made.
The Single Appeal was dismissed for default as the applicant failed to appear on record despite various calls. No pronouncement of law was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/110/2024 MRINAL AHUJA Vs PIRAMAL CAPITAL AND HOUSING FINANCE LTD(PIRAMAL FINANCE)
26.04.2024 Item No.74
Present: None for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Nobody has put appearance on behalf of the applicant despite various calls. In these circumstances, this SA is dismissed for default . File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.
Pronounced in the open Tribunal
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
Mrinal Ahuja
Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd(Piramal Finance)
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court