In an original application for debt recovery, the Debt Recovery Tribunal disposed of the case as withdrawn after the defendants settled the loan account outside the court during its pendency.
The application was disposed of as withdrawn upon settlement of the loan account.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE LOKADALAT DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL - II HYDERABAD
AWARI) DATED ,16.03.2024.
IN
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO .938/2023
Present:-
Reference made by
Applicant Bank through: M Srinivas, Advocate.
Defendants through: Advocate.
Between:-
Canara Bank
...... Applicant
Versus
Sri Yashrvanth Feeds & Ors.
. .... Defendants
l."whereas thi apprhant bank has fired the instant oA in this Tribunal for ,r'r rt'covery qf a sum of Rs.32,69,604ps together with future interest, costs 1etc against the defendants. ' ,-1 i. .'o - := ." ,,li{., .,'i'.^ ....
O.A. No.938/2023
(Given under the hand and seal ofthe Lok Adalat Bench on this the l6n day of March, 2024.)
plrwv
.Dildsh Kumar
.ffi*-, Rameshwar Kothe
Member Member Presiding Officer
Canara Bank
Rameshwar Kothe
G. Dinesh Kumar
P. Rajeshwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
