Application dismissed as settled; debts recovered; no further proceedings necessary; applicant bank withdraws request for fee refund while not claiming prejudice to respondents.
Application dismissed as settled and withdrawn; refund of application fee granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
| Order Sheet (continuation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Case No.OA/ | 483/2022 STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs 916, E PARI JEWELLER PRIVATE LIMITED |
|
| Date of the Order |
Order with Signature | Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary |
| 03/12/2024 | Ld. Advocate Ms. M. Sharma appears on behalf of Ld. Advocate Ms. D. Lahiri for the Applicant Bank and submits that account has been settled. This application is affirmed by Mr. Suresh Chandra Panda, the Authorized Representative of the Bank and his signature is identified by Advocate on record. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant Bank also prays for refund of application fee. In view of this, no prejudice will be caused to the OA defendants if their response is dispensed with in this IA. This instant OA and any other pending IAs are disposed of in the category of dismissed as withdrawn as settled. |
|
| (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer |
(Sp)
STATE BANK OF INDIA
916, E PARI JEWELLER PRIVATE LIMITED
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
