Uco Bank v. Paramjit Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Referencing applicant's consent to compromise, Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chandigarh dismissed opening application OA/375/2023 as withdrawn by applicant.
What did the court decide?
OA/375/2023 dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/375/2023 UCO BANK Vs PARAMJIT SINGH .
18.04.2024 Item No.21
Present: Sh. Rahul Sharma, proxy Counsel for Sh. Sumit Narang, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has made a statement at the bar that the parties have compromised the matter and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
UCO BANK
- respondent
PARAMJIT SINGH
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court