Allowed

State Bank of India v. Sri Amit Das and Ors.

DRT15 Apr 2024OA/239/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Debt Recovery Tribunal, Kolkata, ex parte allowed Original Application filed by State Bank of India against four respondents for recovery of loan dues totaling Rs. 27,36,879.89 with future interest, and issued recovery certificate.

What did the court decide?

Recovery of Rs. 27,36,879.89 with future interest at 11% per annum; Recovery Certificate issued; Defendants debarred from alienating properties.

State Bank of India versus Sri Amit Das and Ors. — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2024)

¶1

¶2

¶3

BEFORE THE^{DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-IIIKOLKATA} PRESENT:^{-SRIKAMAL DE.}

¶4

PRESIDING^OFFICER

¶5

o.A. No. 239^{0f 2022}

¶6

DATE OF DELIVERY^{OF ORDERIls/04/2(J24}

¶7

stateBanko'India,abankinglnstilUtionandabodycorporateconstitUted. '".".r"Li"a^{under theprovisions of the State Bank of IndiaAct' 1955 havinqrts} CentralofficeatSiateBankEhawan,}4adamCamaRoad,|YUmbai.400021andlocal ,"uO Off,." at^{1, StrandRoad, Kolkata-7oOO01and carrying on their bankinq} business^{inter alia amongst othersat their branch office at RACPC KolkataBranch'} Ouu", ,u,nn,r,^{GroundFloor, 59A, Chowringhee Road'Kotkata-700020'P'S'} Bhowanipore,^{commonly knownas State Bank of India'RACPC Kolkata Branch'} -xortuiu i"."inurt". referred as the ..Appticant Bank", within the jurisdiction or Lhrs Learned^Tribunal

¶8

Applrcant Bank

¶9

Sri Amit^{Das,son of An I llas, resrd ng al l\4uraPaschim Bamanqach'2'1} Parcganas^{(NorLh), Bamangachr,west Bengal743248}

¶10

M/s Banai^{OevelopersPrivate Limited'havLng rts RegsleredOifceat 5/'1A'} Hunqerford Street,^{48,Castle House,l'rFloor' Kolkata 700017}

¶11

Sri Sudip Samanta,^{son of AsrtSamanta, resrdingat Ward No 20' Dharnd'r'} Tamluk^{(M),PLrrbaN4ednipur,West Bengal721636}

¶12

Ms Priyanka^{Das Samanta,wle of Sud p S'lmanla'resdLngirt fvard No 20'} Dhaanda. Tarnluk^{(14),Purbal'lednrpur, West Bengai 721636}

¶13

Defendants

¶14

Counse^{for the APP|lcant Bank:}

¶15

An rban Pramanrck,^Advocate

Set ex Parte on

9la4 /2424

lUOGEUE]\I

Ihe Applrcant Bank^{filedthe present OA berng No A A l239l2A22or1110512022 fat} recovery of a total^{sum of Rs. 213l,AAg/'(Rupeeslwenlyseven lakhthirtyqeven thousand} erqht hundred^{erghty nineonly) from the DefendantstowardsLermloan togetherwith} rnLerest,^{coSL and otherusual reiiefs'}

¶21

The Defendants are^{servedwith summonsThe defendantsdid not appear' a! there was no} representatron^{lromLhe defendants, the casewasfrxedfor ex parte hearrnq on 9/A4/24)4'} and heard ex Parte^accordrnglY.

¶22

examined^{16 documentslhrouqh Srl BlswanathSen'Ass slanL General} The ApPllcant^Bank Exhrb t Annexure^{A to Exh b I AnnexurPN'} Iulanager^{rnarked as}

¶23

Heard the^{Ld. Counselfor the Applrcant Bank'}

¶24

The^po nt that^{ar ses for consLderatron s:}

¶25

to the clarm^{made ln the OA agarnst the DefendanLs} Whether^{Lhe ApplicantBankis entitled} and OA schedule^{propertres as prayed} fo(?

¶26

As sLated supra,^{the Defendant remainedabsenLand drd notLLrrn up to 'ontrovertlhe} verson of^{the O.A of Appl canLBank' It appearsthal theDefendants have fa ed lo fle} \rr tien statement^{w lhrn the slLpulaLedpcrod as n a\rThe EvrdenceAffLdav t coup ed wrth} the reclals^{ln the documentsviz',Exhlblts Annexure A lo AnnexllreN marked on behaLfof} the Applrcant^{Bank, establishedthec arm of the Applicant Bank against the DPfendantsand} oAscheduLeproperLles,Hence,IholdthattheDefendantsarejolntLyandseverallylab]elo pay to the Appl canL^{Bankthe cla ms made rn the OA wrth fulure lnLerestand costs'}

¶27

ln the resll L lhe^{present Orrglnal Appical on s allowed ex partew th costs' as under:}

O&D LR

O.A. No. 239^{of 2A22 flledby the Appllcanl Bankrs allowed and debt ls determrnedw th cost} agarnst the^{defendants. It ls hereby orderedthatapplrcanlbank is entrtled to recover from} Lhe defendants^{the tolal amounlto Lhe Luneaf R'' 2f} '37 '88g1^{(Rupeestwenly sevenlakh} thrrty seven^{thousand erght hundrede ghtynlne onLy)wrth pendentelrteand fulurernterest} (.rl 11.00o/. per annum rnferest^{w th simple on the amollntduefrom the dateof Fil nq of lhe} Onq na App^{lcaton -e. 13/0512A22t ll full andfrnal reallzabon of the claimamolrnt'}

¶32

(2) Amolrnl, r any,^{pald by the defendanls ln the loan accounts or amounl' rl any'recoveredby} the Applicant^{BankaFter nling of the O A' the same be takenrnto accounl whre arr vLnq at} the exacL arnoUnt^{of dUes/deblpayableby the defendants,Accordn9ly, pendentellte and} future rnterest shall^{be calculated on lhe reduced amounL'}

¶33

(3) Defendants are^debarred from disposing,^{alienatingor dealingwith any of theproperties} aforesald decretal^{debt is recovbred from the defendants}

¶34

belonging lo them^{till the}

¶35

(4) Defendants are^{qrven a time of thirtydays from Lhe daLeof the ludgement/F nal Orderfor} repayrng of^{the above mentioned dues, so inLmatedto them ln casethe defendantsfarl to} pay the dues with n lhe^{above mentronedt me, the applcanLbank s entrtlerd to recoverrts} dues by sale^{ol secured assets, if anyApplicanlbanks also eni t ed to proceedagansl} personal properties of^{Lhe delendants(Bolh movableand rmmovable)and a so proceed} aga nst the defendanls^{personallylo recover lhe duesn accordancewllhlaw'}

¶36

(s) Lel the Cert^{iicaLeof Recoverybe drawn up by Ld' Reqrslrar forthw lhrn termsof} ludgement^{for rssllanceof the same agarnst defendantsin favour of theapp cantbank} under SecLon^{19 (22) ot theRecovery of DebtsandBankruptcyAct' 199f and put up the} same for tssLlance^{of lheCertif cate'}

¶37

(6) Ld. Recovery^{OFficer shall realizethe amounlas per the Recovery Certificale fromthe} defendants^{in accordancewith law'}

¶38

(7) Ld. Reqistrar^{of this Tribunal ls directed to deliver recovery cerllficate in Lermof thefinal} order/judgement^{for recovery of the sum agarnstthe defendantin favourof theApplicant} Bank under^{Section 19 (22) of lheRecovery of Debtsdue to the Bank andFrnancral} InstrtutonsAct,lgg3nowknownasRecoveryofDebtsandBankruptcyAct'1993'

¶39

(8) The^parties are^{darectedto appear before the RecoveryOfficer on 18/06/2024 for further} actton in accordance^{wilhlaw in the eventthe entire amount is not paid by the said date'}

¶40

Accordinqly, lhe^{Original Application beingO'A No239 oF 2022is allowedandstands} dlsposed of.

¶41

Copy of the ludgement/Final^{Order be uploadin the Tribunal'swebsrte'} File is consigned^{to the Record Room'}

¶42

Lo 'd^{ed ro !e' o. I dn\ | bFd b!h m.i o,,FL'po.<iar ed ond} Pronounred^{by mern the ope.Court ontlrrs} L5t'dav of Apn,2024)

¶43

( KAN4AL DE ) PRESiDING OFFICER

¶44

Debts Recovery^{Tribunal-3, Kolkata} Order Sheet (Continuation )

¶45

case No. oA No. 23912022 l
Srqnatur€ ol Partres
S!deLI'r,s. g order pronounced (vide separate sheeLs )
ot.15/04/2024
In the result, O.A. No. 239 of 2022 rs allowed w th costs Issue
Recovery CertlficaLe accord nqly.
( Kamal De )
Presrd ng Offrcer
DRT 3, KOLKATA
I
t

State Bank of India v. Sri Amit Das and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State Bank of India v. Sri Amit Das and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Punjab National Bank versus Anirban Dasgupta and Anr.

Punjab National Bank versus M/S Hrk Spare Parts and Ors.

State Bank of India versus Diptendu Pandit and Ors.

State Bank of India versus Kanchan Chakraborty and Anr.

Uco Bank versus Kundan Jaiswal and Ors.

Punjab National Bank versus Ms Swasthik Enterprise and Ors.