The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the applicant bank's request to withdraw its appeal and refund court fees. The appeal against the judgment under challenge is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn by the registry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
oLl237l2023 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Vs DHARMENDRA SINGH AND oRs
t6.08.2024
Item no. 58
Present: Mr. GPS Verma, counsel for applicant bank. None for defendants.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencingl hybrid Mode.
IA no.3o77l2024 & rA No.3o78 12024 has been fired by the applicant bank for withdrawal of the present oA and refund of the court fees.
The Ld. counsel for the applicant bank submits that the defendants have approached the applicant bank for upgrade the loan account and offered the outstanding overdue amount to the applicant bank. He further submits that he wish to withdraw the present OA and also prayed for refund of the couft fee.
In view of above, rA no.3o77 12024 & rA No.3o78 12o24 are atlowed. OA 237 l2}2g is dismissed as withdrawn. Registry is directed to refund the couft fee as per rures. All the pending IAs stand disposed of.
File be consigned to record room.
-,-,i-v__g.' (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
A
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
DHARMENDRA SINGH AND Ors.
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
