A Lok Adalat awarded notice under Section 13(5) of the RBI Act, 1934, dismissing an application for notice under Section 13(5) of the RBI Act, 1934.
The parties settled the dispute at Rs. 8,00,000/- and the case was disposed in terms of the settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT AT DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-3, KOLKATA. JEEVANSUDHA BUILDING, 42C,JAWAHARLAL NEHRU 8rH FLooR, KoLKATA-7oo 071
lffi
l. qr- \Ii/ .e.:
Q,l?l;l;!9
Dated June 22, 2024
Plaintiff:
Defendant/ Respondent
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Khokan Mukherjee & Anr.
Case No. O.A. 2r0l2023 (Sl.No.8)
PRESENT:
(1) SHRI KAMAL OE, Judicial Officer (Retd.)
(2) MS. DEBJANI SAHU, Advocate (Member)
AWARD
Upon consent of the parties, the dispute between the parties have been referred for determination to the Lok Adalat and the parties having compromised /settled the case/matter, the following award is passed in terms of the settlement :-
The case is taken up for hearing.
The claim of the petitioner Bank recoverable from the Defendant amounts to
The parties have amicably settled dispute at Rs. 8,00,000/-.
In view of the compromise arrived between the parties the OA is disposed of in terms of the settlement.
Bank may file separate application before Registrar for refund of court fees. Registrar will do the needful in accordance with law.
.\s, " '-q
-u--Yi-.t'zu
(MS. DEBJANI SAHU) Advocate (Member)
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Khokan Mukherjee & Anr.
SHRI KAMAL DE
MS. DEBJANI SAHU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
