The Debt Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad Bench at Vidyasagar Nagar, gave a summary disposal of the defendant's OA against the bank for recovery of a specific sum along with interest and costs.
NA
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I AT HYDERABAD
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER' 20.24
PRESENT: SRI GUMMADI GOPICHAND, PRESIDING oFFIcER
OA,No.192 of 2024
Between:
State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Recovery Branch-II, 1-B-563/1, 1tt floor, Opp Sandhya Theatre, RTC Cross Roads, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad, Telangana State. Represented by its Chief Manager
Applicant
VERSUS
Mr. JamalpurBalvanth Rao, S/o J. Rama Rao, aged 57 years, Occ: Govt Employee, R/o H.No.5-B-260, Sree ram nagar Colony, Kamareddy, Nizamabad, Telangana State - 503 111
Defendant
Counsel for theparties:
For the Applicant
For the Defendant
Smt B. RamanaKumari Exparte
ORDER
- The Appricant Bank fired the present oA against Defendant for recovery of a total sum of Rs.31,72,53g/_ (Rupees Thirty One
Lakhs Seventy Two Thirty Eight
only) i.e.,
*
i .:il
.1. .n (t .t.
. /.
^\ b-- -:<br>',,-l,,'*th;g3,E$}'
(oA. No.192l2024)
(oA.No.19212024)
(oA.No.192/2024)
(Dictated to the P.A , transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 11th day of Nov, 2024)
sd/(G. GOPTCHAND) PRESIDING OFFICER
fi*vg;coPY /V Ll,S4 --1<-A3ri.Rtglsrrar - r ort. llYDli2 F.rtfic '
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the bank is entitled to recover the claimed dues from the defendant?
Whether the evidence placed on record substantiates the bank's claim under the OA?
What is the nature of payment and entitlement of costs to the applicant bank by the defendant under the order passed?
State Bank of India
Jamalapur Balvanth Rao
Gummadichand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
