The applicant Bank filed an application for recovery against Defendants. During pendency, Defendants deposited Rs. 13,80,947 via OTS and closed their account. The court disposed of the application as withdrawn upon the Bank's prayer.
Application disposed of as withdrawn upon settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No.
coN TD. ORDER.SH EET
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA179/23 24/09/24 |
Appticantby ShriShreyasDubey, Advocate NonefortheDefendants |
|
| CounselfortheAppticantBankhasfitedan ApplicationforWithdrawalofthecaselA4277/23 dated27/09/23atongwithAffidavitofShriSuraj PrasadAhirwar,ChiefManager.ltisstatedthatthe Applicant-Bankhasfitedthepresentoriginal applicationforrecoveryofRs.29,29,217.06together withinterestandcosts againsttheDefendants.ltis furtherstatedthatduringthependencyof theOAthe DefendantshavedepositedtotaIamountofRs. 13,80,947/-underOTSandtheaccount hasbeen closed.TheCounselfortheApplicant-bankfurther praysfor withdrawal of thepresentQA. |
||
| ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficerofthe Appticant-Bankandthesubmissionmadebythe CounselforApplicantthat theDefendanthas depositedan amountofRs.13,80,947l-towardsfutl andfinalsettlementofthecase,thepresentOA standsdisposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbe consignedto therecordroomatJabatpur. (Ra atet) Presidin officer |
Bank
Defendants
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
