The Tribunal disposed of the original application for recovery as settled out of court after the defendants remitted a sum towards a one-time settlement during pendency. The applicant's prayer for document return was allowed.
OA claim treated as settled out of Court; return of documents directed; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OA 161 OF 2022
15.02.2024
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 15th day of February, 2024
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K.
Presiding Officer
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 161 of 2022
M/s. City Union Bank Ltd., Ambattur Branch, Rep by its Branch Manager, 174, South Park Street, Venkatapuram, Ambattur, Chennai - 600 053.
….Applicant -Vs-
Also at No.18 AIBEA Nagar, Mogappiar West, Chennai - 600 037.
….Defendants
Counsels on record / appeared: Counsel for Applicant : M/s. Ananda Gomathy
OA 161 OF 2022
2
15.02.2024
ORDER
(Dictated to PS, transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in Open Court, on this the 15th day of February, 2024)
Sd/(GANAPATHI K.R.K) PRESIDING OFFICER
M/s. City Union Bank Ltd., Ambattur Branch
M/s. Velans Package
Mrs. S. Lakshmi
Mr. L.B.Senthil Kumar
Ganapathi K.R.K.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
