Disposed
Canara Bank v. M/S Samarth Construction
DRTOA/1477/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD .oRDER.SHEET
¶2
| D.ATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA1477/22 07/05t24 |
AppticantbyShriAtok Mishra, Advocate NonefortheDefendants |
|
| CounselfortheAppticantBankhasfitedan applicationforwithdrawatoftheoriginalapptication alongwithAffidavitofShriVinayAhuja,Branch Manageron70/10/73.ltisstatedthattheAppticant- Bank hasfited thepresentOAforrecoveryofRs. 36,26,023.00togetherwithinterestandcosts against theDefendants.ltisfurtherstatedthatduringthe pendencyoftheOAtheDefendanthassetttedher accountunder OneTimeSetttementandhas depositedtheentirecompromise amountofRs. 15.80 Lacandlastpayment was madeon31/05i23.The Counsel'fortheAppticant-bankfurtherpraysfor withdrawa[ of thepresentOA. |
||
| ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficerofthe Appticant-Bankandthesubmissionmadebythe CounselforAppticantthattheDefendanthas depositedanamountofRs.15.80 towardsfutland finalsetttementofthecase,thepresentOAstands disposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbeconsignedto therecordroom. (Ram NiwasPatet) Presidingofficer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant-Bank
- respondent
Defendant
Coram
AI extract
Ram Niwas Patet
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court