Icici Bank Limited v. Suresh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed an interlocutory application seeking a refund of court fees paid for a withdrawn original application after the parties amicably settled the debt recovery matter.
What did the court decide?
Interlocutory application for refund of court fees allowed; Original Application dismissed as withdrawn; refund of court fees directed to the Registrar.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.20
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.671 of 2024 In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.140 of 2024
ICICI Bank Ltd. … Applicant
Versus
Suresh Adani & Anr. … Defendants
Mr Arif Ansari i/b M/s. H & M Legal Asso. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 2nd April 2024.
ORDER
Parties & counsel
- applicant
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Coram
Deepak M. Thakkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court