Dismissed
State Bank of India v. Bibek Ranjan Das
DRTOA/134/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Disposes of withdrawn recovery petition as settled amicably upon realization of amount by applicant bank.
What did the court decide?
O.A. No. 134 of 2022 and all pending I.A.s dismissed as withdrawn settled amicably; I.A. No. 2555 disposed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
¶2
| CaseNo.OAl1 | 34/2022 StateBankofIndia vs.Bibek RajanDas |
|---|---|
| Dateof order |
orderwlthsignature |
| OrderNo,4 ot.12107 12024 Sl.No.12 |
Present: ForApplicant:Mr.M KManna,LdCounsel ForOefendant:None |
| som | Ld Counselfor theApplicantfiledI.A.No.2565of2024inviewof the factthat theO.A.wasfiledseeklng recoveryofRs. 23,42,873/-andprayedforwithdrawalof thepresent O.A.The application is supported by affidavitofMr. MantuKumarMondal, Chief Managerof theapplicantBank. Duringthependencyofthe O.A.thedefendant have compromisedandsettledthematter andtheapplicantbank hasrealizedandreceivedthesettled amountandmadeprayertodisposeofthematterfornon prosecution, There is noother impedimentifprayeris so allowed, Accordingly,I.A.No, 2555of2024isdisposedofaswithdrawnas settled amicably.I.A.No. 2564 beingtheputuppetitionisalso disposed of. |
| The Applicant is dlrectedtoreturntheorlglnalTitleDeedtothe O.A.defendantsif itisnotalready returnedwithin15days from the date ofthisorder.Sofar asrefundofCourtfeeis concerned, hemayapproachbeforetheLdRegistrarwhowilltake appropriate decisionlnthe matterasperextantrules. |
|
| O.A.No.134of2022 alongwithallpendlngI.A.s,ifany,are dismissedaswithdrawnassettled amicably. File beconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobservingall formalities. (KamalDe) PresldlngOfficer DRT-3,Kolkata |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
State Bank of India
Coram
AI extract
KamalDe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court