Icici Bank Limited v. Nscc Material Suppliers
Case brief
What is this about?
An order hotting an OA for recovery of dues because the applicant-bank withdrew the application after the defendants deposited the compromise amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA1331/23 25t10t24 |
AppticantbyVedantAgrawat,Advocate Defendantsare ex-part |
|
| TheCounselforAppticant-Bankhasfitedan AppticationforwithdrawatoftheOAsupportedwith an AffidavitofShriVineetBhasin,Manager.ltis statedthattheAppticant-BankhasfiLedthepresent OAforrecoveryofduesandotherretiefsagainst the Defendants.ltisfurtherstatedthatduringthe pendencyoftheOAtheDefendanthaddeposited entirecompromiseamountofRs.22,63,425/'towards futtandfinalsettlement.TheCounsetforAppticant submitsthattheBankfurtherpraysforwithdrawal of thepresentOA. |
||
| Consideringthefactthat theDefendantshave depositedthecompromiseamountofRs.72,63,4751- towardsfuttandfinatsetttement,thepresentOA standsdisposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbe consignedtotherecordroom. (RamNiwas Patet) Presidingofficer |
Vedant Agrawat
Defendants
Ram Niwas Patet
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court