Icici Bank Limited v. Tarvar Singh
DRTOA/1282/2022
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
PAGE No
¶2
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA1282/22 15/04t24 |
AppticantbyShriVivek Shukla, Advocate Defendantsare ex-parte |
|
| Matter onbeingtakenupforex-partefinalargument theCounselfortheAppticantBanksubmittedthatthe accounthasbeensettledandatsosubmittedthathe hasfited aMemoalongwithaffidavitofShriVineet BhasinManageroftheAppticant-Bank,fortakingthe matterintheLokAdatat hetdon09/03174butwas notlisted beforetheLokAdatat.Hefurtherpraysfor withdrawalofthematterconsideringtheaffidavit filedon06103/24wherebytheOfficeroftheBank deposedthattheDefendantshavedepositedRs.8.20 Lactowardsfutlandfina[paymentandtheaccountof theDefendantshasbeenctosed. |
||
| (Ram as Patet) Presidingofficer ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficerofthe Applicant-Bankandthesubmissionmadebythe CounsetforApp[icantthattheDefendanthas depositedanamountofRs.8.20 towardsfu[[and finalsetttementofthecase,thepresentOAstands disposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbeconsignedto therecordroom. |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Shri Vivek Shukla
- respondent
Bank Officer
Coram
AI extract
Ramases Patet
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court