Disposed
Hdfc Bank v. Mohammad Atik
DRTOA/1068/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶2
PAGE No.
¶3
CASE No....
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA1068/ '05to?'t24 |
Appticantby Shri Abhishek Agrawat, Advocate Nonefor theDefendants CounselfortheAppticantBank hasfitedanaffidavit oiinriPrabhatSirrivastava, Post Manager(Law)for withdrawatoftheOA.Hedeposedthatthe Appticant-Bankhasfited thepresentOAforrecovery oiht.21,13,896.07againsttheDefendantstogether withinterestandcosis.Hefurtherdeposited.that JriinethependencyoftheOAthematterhasbeen i"itt"AandtheDefendants had depositeda.namount ofRs.l5.4SLactowardsfuttandfinalsettlementof dues.TheCounselfortheAppticant'bank further praysfor withdrawalof thepresentOA' |
|
| Consideringtheaffidavit oftheOfficerofthe Appticant-Bankandthe submissionmadebYthe CounseIforAPPticant that theDefendantshave depositedtheentiresetttementamountofRs.15.48 Lactowardsfuttandfinalsetttement ofthedues, the presentOAstandsdisPosed ofaswithdrawn.Record beconsig nedtotherecordroom. (RamNiwas Patet) Presidingofficer |
¶5
PAGE No..
¶6
t
¶7
CASE No.
¶8
| DATE DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER REMARK |
|---|
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant-Bank
Coram
AI extract
Ram Niwas Pathak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court