The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an interlocutory application for withdrawal of the underlying original application after a matter was amicably settled. The principal application was dismissed as withdrawn and court fees were directed to be refunded.
Interlocutory Application No.2756 allowed; Original Application No.1020 dismissed as withdrawn; court fees refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.22
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2456 of 2023
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.1020 of 2023
HDFC Bank … Applicant
Versus
Shradha Chopra … Defendant
Mr Kumar Abhishek i/b Ms Aarti Nimbalkar – Advocate for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 11th January 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
11.01.2024
Sr. No.22
| OA No.1020 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
HDFC Bank Vs. Shradha Chopra |
| Mr Kumar Abhishek i/b Ms Aarti Nimbalkar – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 21 | 1. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented affidavit (exhibit-21), taken on record. 2. Order in I.A. No.2756 of 2023 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.2756 of 2023, O.A. No.1020 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
|
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
HDFC Bank
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
